Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:48

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
20M Eggs Recalled Amid Salmonella Outbreak - Newser
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Who Will Replace Anna Wintour at ‘Vogue’? - The Cut
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Drug deaths plummet among young Americans as fentanyl carnage eases - NPR
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Aflac: Hackers May Have Customers' Personal Data - Newser
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Gmail’s AI summaries now appear automatically - The Verge
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Which is the safest protein powder in India for use?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.